Comments on: Is a Nano the Right Car for You?

By: bob

bob — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:37:10 +0000

I suspect that in the U.S. most families have at least two cars because Mom and Dad both work. Only one has to be large enough for the whole family. It makes sense that the second car should be very compact and fuel effecient. Right now, many of the second cars are purchased as used cars and still cost more than a brand new Nano. Hell yes I would buy one for $2500.

By: onion

onion — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:52:38 +0000

22%?

American car makers would KILL for a 22% share of the market.

By: DAVID

DAVID — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:42:46 +0000

THIS IS THE ONLY WAY OUT OF OIL DEPENDENCY AND DO THE RIGHT THINH FOR THE ENVIROMENT, THIS IS A PERFECT CAR TO GO BACK AND FOURTH TO WORK, ITS THE PERGECT CAR FOR A STUDENT. PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY STILL TREAT CARS LIKE GODS, I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE LOOSING THEIR HOMES AND HAVE TWO 400-600 DOLLARS A MONTH CARS PARK OUTSIDE.

By: Nicci

Nicci — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:37:30 +0000

Fridge Magnate:

The average US American has more bills/debt than an average Indian will ever encounter.

Stealing doctors? No one is forcing these doctors on a plane and putting them to work. Most Indian Dr’s prefer to work here.

And we aren’t depriving ANYONE of their transportation. We’re supplying India with more funds to boost their economy. They aren’t offering less cars in India because they offer cars to the US.

WAKE UP and get out from underneath that rock you live under.

By: Kate

Kate — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:33:30 +0000

I’d buy this car in a minute. Of course, my the time they brought it up to American safety requirements it would be more expensive, but it could double in price and still be the cheapest thing on the market. Go Nano!

By: Fridge Magnate

Fridge Magnate — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:30:10 +0000

The NANO was designed cheap to meet the transportation needs of poor people in third world countries, who earn a few thousand dollars per year. It’s a disgrace that people earning 20 or 30 or 40 times as much from the richest country in the world would try to get these cars diverted to the US. The average US worker earns enough in 25 weeks to pay for a new Ford Focus. An Indian worker earning $30 per week would need to work more than twice as long to buy a Nano. It’s bad enough we steal the doctors these countries have spent millions to educate and desperately need. Now we want to deprive them of basic transportation.

By: london removals

london removals — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:58:31 +0000

I have been watching the recent stories on this wonderful little car.

Even though it is cheap its launch in India will soon show how rugged the car is as India has one of the highest rates of car crashes in the world.

By: TataNano.net » Tata Nano – To Take America By Storm? | Daily Fuel Economy Tip

Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:33:37 +0000

[...] original here: Tata Nano – To Take America By Storm? | Daily Fuel Economy Tip Comments [...]

By: crash courses

crash courses — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:47:45 +0000

Yes it maybe cheap but does that also mean its made cheaply!

This is usually the case and because of this the car will only last a short while and then need repairing etc.

By: muru

muru — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:07:16 +0000

Nano is a commuter car and nothing else. It could replace your bike / scooter. Think of all the activities you do with a scooter, you can do the same with a roof over your head.

As for as its quality is concerned, even if it runs only for 2 years and dies, you can still buy 10 nanos and use for 20 years instead of buying a 25k car and use for 8 to 10 years.